Effect of Feeder Modification and Feed Form on Feed Loss and Conversion Efficiency in Small-Scale Broiler Farms
Keywords:
broiler’s age, feed waste, pellet, mash, feeder typesAbstract
Feed losses in broiler farms are negatively affecting the health and growth of broiler and thus reducing profitability. This study aimed to estimate feed loss in small-scale broiler farms using two modified conventional feeders, Trough and Tube feeders, and two different feed forms, Mash and Pellet. The experiment was carried out using non-modified feeders and modified by attaching a 4×4 cm protective net to Trough feeder and reducing length from 6 cm to 4 cm to Tube feeder. Results showed a very slight effect of feeder type on feed loss for the benefit of the Trough feeder. The feed losses were significantly noted (from 3.91% to 1.84% before and after modification, respectively) when feeding Mashed feed with Trough feeder. Similarly, it was significantly reduced from 8.17% to 2.10% before and after modification, respectively, when fed Pelleted feed with Trough feeder. However, the feed loss decreased as the older the broiler chicken gets (losses reduced from 9.93% in the 4th week to 2.39% in the 7th week). Feed loss was significantly increased when feeding pellet feed (loss=10.76%) as compared to mashed feed (feed loss=2.60%). The feed conversion ratios (FCR) were 1.93 and 1.88 when Trough and Tube feeder types were used, respectively. The feed losses were reduced from 7.32% to 0.75% and 6.04% to 1.97% for modified Tube and Trough feeders, respectively. In conclusion, feed loss was decreased as the broiler age increased, and the loss rate was higher using Pellet feed compared to Mash feed. Summing up, modified feeder by itself had no significant effect on feed loss, even though feed loss was substantially reduced, and FCR was improved.
Received: xx June 2025
Revised: xx July 2025
Accepted: xx July 2025
Published online first: xx September 2025
References
1. Amerah AM, Ravindran V, Lentle RG, Thomas DG. Influence of feed particle size and feed form on the performance, energy utilization, digestive tract development, and digesta parameters of broiler starters. Poult Sci. 2007;86:2615–2623. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00212
2. Hafez HM, Attia YA, Challenges to the poultry industry: Current perspectives and strategic future after the COVID-19 outbreak. Front Vet Sci. 2020;26(7):516 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00516
3. Choi J. Challenges in poultry production systems and nutritional interventions. Animals. 2025;15(4):530. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15040530
4. Al-Atiyat RM, Aljumaah RS, Abudabos AM, Alotybi MN, Harron RM, Algawaan AS, et al. Differentiation of free-ranging chicken using discriminant analysis of phenotypic traits. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2017;46(10):791–799. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-92902017001000001
5. 6. Ziaei SM, Amini MA. Investigation of waste in livestock and poultry industry and methods to improve feed conversion ratio in it. J. Environ. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2020;2:5-12. https://doi.org/10.47176/alkhass.2.4.5
6. Katu JK, Tóth T, Varga L. Enhancing the nutritional quality of low-grade poultry feed ingredients through fermentation: A Review. Agriculture. 2025;15(5):476. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15050476
7. Ahmed SKh, Butris GY. The off-feeding intervals effect on some performance traits of broilers. Iraqi J Vet Med. 2014;38(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.30539/iraqijvm.v38i1.255
8. Al-Shadeedi SM, Al-Hamiari MA, Al-Obaidi FA. Effect of feed withdrawal and adding dried bakery yeast in the diet on dressing percentage and meat chemical composition of broilers. Iraqi J Vet Med. 2009;33(2):98–103. https://doi.org/10.30539/iraqijvm.v33i2.698
9. Al-Hamiari MA. Study the effect of feed withdrawal and adding dried bakery yeast in the diet on pH and some microbial types of broiler chickens intestine. Iraqi J Vet Med. 2007;31(2):39–50. https://doi.org/10.30539/iraqijvm.v31i2.786
10. Avi R. Responses of poultry to heat stress and mitigation strategies during summer in tropical countries: A Review. Iraqi J Vet Med. 2024;48(2):55–65. https://doi.org/10.30539/1y9y3h89
11. Jahan MS, Asaduzzaman, M, Sarkar AK. Performance of broiler fed on mash, pellet and crumble. Int J Poult Sci. 2006;5:265–270. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.265.270
12. Belkhanchi H, Ziat Y, Hammi M, Ifguis O. Formulation, optimization of a poultry feed and analysis of spectrometry, biochemical composition and energy facts. South African J Chem Eng. 2023;44:31–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2023.01.005
13. Fosu GO, Konadu JB, Yeboah MY, Darko OK. Minimization of layer feed cost using linear programming. Eng Appl Sci Lett. 2023;6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.30538/psrp-easl2023.0090
14. Abdollahi MR, Ravindran V, Svihus B. Pelleting of broiler diets: An overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;179(1-4):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.10.011
15. Amin SAS, Sobhi N. Process optimization in poultry feed mill. Sci Rep. 2023;13:9897. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36072-w
16. Amerah AM, Ravindran V, Lentle RG, Thomas DG. Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World’s Poul Sci J. 2007;63(3):439–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001560
17. Abudabos AM, Samara E, Hussein EOS, Al-Atiyat RM, Al-Haidary A. Influence of stocking density on welfare indices of broilers. Ital J Anima Sci. 2013;12(2):213–218. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e35
18. Abbas BA, Nurdianti RR. Feed additives used in nutrition and improve the poultry performance and health: A review. Iraqi J Vet Med. 2025;49(1):31–44. https://doi.org/10.30539/kyt5dj31
19. Ferket P, Gernat AG. Factors that affect feed intake of meat birds : A Review. Intern J Poult. Sci. 2006;5(10):905-911. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.905.911
20. Al-Atiyat R. Genetic diversity of indigenous chicken ecotypes in Jordan. Africa J Biotec. 2010;9(41):7014–7019. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB09.388
21. Neves DP, Banhazi TM, Nääs IA. Feeding behavior of broiler chickens: a review on the biomechanical characteristics. Braz J Poult Sci. 2014;16(2):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-635x16021-16
22. Huang XF, Xue JJ, Liu ZL, Chen Y, Luo Y, Wang QG, et al . Effects of feed trough positioning height on growth performance, feed loss, feeding environment, and behavior of geese. Poult Sci. 2022;101(12):102179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102179
23. Neves DP, Nääs IA, Vercellino RD, de Moura DJ. Do broilers prefer to eat from a certain type of feeder? Braz J Poul Sci. 2010;12(3):179-87. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2010000300007
24. Peron A, Bastianelli D, Oury FX, Gomez J, Carre B. Broiler performance and the effect of feed form and enzyme supplementation. Poul Sci. 2005;84(9):1343–1351. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.9.1343
25. Aviagen. Broiler Performance Objectives – Ross 308. USA. 2012. Available from: https://en.aviagen.com
26. SAS – Statistical Analysis System Institute,2012. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.1. SAS. Inst. Inc. Cary. N.C. USA. 2012.
27. Asghar Saki A, Zamani P, Rahmati M, Mahmoudi H. The effect of cage density on laying hen performance, egg quality, and excreta minerals. J Appl Poult Res. 2012;21:467–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00318
28. Myers AJ, Goodband RD, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, DeRouchey JM, Nelssen JL. The effects of feeder adjustment and trough space on growth performance of finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:4576–4582. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5389
29. Chewning CG, Stark CR, Brake J. Effects of particle size and feed form on broiler performance. J Appl Poult Res. 2012;21(4):830–837. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00553
30. Abudabos AM, Aljumaah RS, Algawaan AS, Al-Sornokh H, Al-Atiyat RM. Effects of hen age and egg weight class on the hatchability of free range indigenous chicken eggs. Brazil J Poult Sci. 2017;19(1):33-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0264
31. Jones FT, Richardson KE. Salmonella in commercially manufactured feeds. Poult Sci. 2004;83(3):384–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.3.384
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
