RESISTANCE OF FOUR DIFFERENT LOCAL HYBRID CHICKENS TO INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE INFECTION
Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 1, 2021
Keywords:
HYBRID CHICKENS, INFECTION, infectious disease
Main Article Content
Abstract
Four hundred, one day old chicks, of four hybrids, were divided into four groups, reared on the floor for ten weeks. The hybrids were vaccinated with live IBD vaccine at 14, 35, 56 days. Maternal antibody titers, antibody titer after each vaccination and bursa index were measured. Results revealed that the Barred local hybrid showed a highest maternal antibody titer and antibody titer after each vaccination, more bursa index lowest mortality. Highly significant correlation (P<0.01) & more linear regression between antibody titer & maternal antibody titers were observed in the barred hybrids.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
RESISTANCE OF FOUR DIFFERENT LOCAL HYBRID CHICKENS TO INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE INFECTION. (2021). The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 26(1), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.30539/ijvm.v26i1.1130
Section
Articles
How to Cite
RESISTANCE OF FOUR DIFFERENT LOCAL HYBRID CHICKENS TO INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE INFECTION. (2021). The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 26(1), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.30539/ijvm.v26i1.1130
References
1. Vieltz. E 1993; Aspects of protection against Gumboro virus. Zootecnica
international 42-49 Nov.
2. Lashor, H. N. & V. S. Davis (1997) History of infectious bursal disease in U.S.A. Avian Dis 41:11-191.
3. Lukert P. D. & Y. M. Saif (1997) Infectious bursal disease. In: Disease of poultry. Iowa state Univ. press Ames. Iowa, U.S.A. 29: 721-738.
4. Abplanalp. H. (1979) The role of genetics in immune response. Avian Dis 23:299-308.
5. Lashor. H. N. & S. M. Shane (1994) Infectious bursal disease. World's poult Sci 50: 133-166.
6. Snedecor. W. G. & G. W. Cochran (1967) statistical methods. Iowa State Univ. press.
7. Hansen MP. J. N. Van Zandi and G. R. J. law (1967) Differences in susceptibility to Marek's disease in chicken carrying two different blood groups alleles poultry. Sci. 48:1286.
8. Gavora I.S. and I. Spencer (1980) Mark's disease in chickens genetic resistsnce to viral neoplastic disease. Academic press inc PP. 364-365.
9. Miller L. L., P. B. Siegal and E. A. Dunnington (1992) Inheritance of antibody response to sheep erythrocytes in lines of chickens divergently selected for fifty six day body weight and their crosses. poultry Sci. 71: 47 -52.
10. Bacon, L. D. N. Ismail & I. V. Motta (1987) Allograf and antibody responses of 1515-13 congenic chickens 219-233. Avian immunology New York.
11.Bumstead, N. R. L. Reece & J. K. A. Cook. (1993) Genetic differences in susceptibility of chicken lines to infection with infectious bursal disease
virus. Poultry Sci. 72:403-410.
12.Cursiefen, D. E. Vieltz, H. Landgraf & H. Becht (1979) Evaluation of a vaccine against infectious bursal disease in field trails. Avian pathol. 8: 341 351.
international 42-49 Nov.
2. Lashor, H. N. & V. S. Davis (1997) History of infectious bursal disease in U.S.A. Avian Dis 41:11-191.
3. Lukert P. D. & Y. M. Saif (1997) Infectious bursal disease. In: Disease of poultry. Iowa state Univ. press Ames. Iowa, U.S.A. 29: 721-738.
4. Abplanalp. H. (1979) The role of genetics in immune response. Avian Dis 23:299-308.
5. Lashor. H. N. & S. M. Shane (1994) Infectious bursal disease. World's poult Sci 50: 133-166.
6. Snedecor. W. G. & G. W. Cochran (1967) statistical methods. Iowa State Univ. press.
7. Hansen MP. J. N. Van Zandi and G. R. J. law (1967) Differences in susceptibility to Marek's disease in chicken carrying two different blood groups alleles poultry. Sci. 48:1286.
8. Gavora I.S. and I. Spencer (1980) Mark's disease in chickens genetic resistsnce to viral neoplastic disease. Academic press inc PP. 364-365.
9. Miller L. L., P. B. Siegal and E. A. Dunnington (1992) Inheritance of antibody response to sheep erythrocytes in lines of chickens divergently selected for fifty six day body weight and their crosses. poultry Sci. 71: 47 -52.
10. Bacon, L. D. N. Ismail & I. V. Motta (1987) Allograf and antibody responses of 1515-13 congenic chickens 219-233. Avian immunology New York.
11.Bumstead, N. R. L. Reece & J. K. A. Cook. (1993) Genetic differences in susceptibility of chicken lines to infection with infectious bursal disease
virus. Poultry Sci. 72:403-410.
12.Cursiefen, D. E. Vieltz, H. Landgraf & H. Becht (1979) Evaluation of a vaccine against infectious bursal disease in field trails. Avian pathol. 8: 341 351.