Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Hernioplasty of Experimentally Induced Large Ventro-lateral Hernia in Bucks

Main Article Content

Saddam K. Hummadi
Rahi N. AL-Asadi

Abstract

The present study is assigned to evaluate the efficiency of hernioplasty in reconstruction of experimentally induced ventro-lateral hernia in bucks using two types of sutures (silk and polypropylene) and to find which thread is more safe and suitable for closure of the hernia, based on ultrasonographic examination.
Sixteen adult local breed bucks were enrolled for this study. All subjected to inducing artificial ventro-lateral hernia (12x10) cm in the right flank under the effect of local anesthesia (2% Lidocaine), then left for one month. After that, animals divided randomly and equally into two groups. In the first group, hernia repaired with silk, while in the second group, hernia closed by polypropylene. Sewing technique is used in both groups. The final appearance was (mesh-like).
Ultrasonographic examination in silk group and after 2 months there was slight improvement in echogenecity and collagen fibers. Polypropylene group and at the same period revealed an increased in echogenecity and decreased lesion size earlier in compare with silk group. In 4 months polypropylene group, reflected high echogenecity and complete infilling of the sewing holes with mature collagen fibers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Hernioplasty of Experimentally Induced Large Ventro-lateral Hernia in Bucks. (2011). The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 35(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.30539/iraqijvm.v35i2.582 (Original work published 2011)
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Hernioplasty of Experimentally Induced Large Ventro-lateral Hernia in Bucks. (2011). The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 35(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.30539/iraqijvm.v35i2.582 (Original work published 2011)

References

- Lannitti D A Hope W W and Norton H J (2008). Technique and outcome of abdominal

incisional hernia repair using synthetic composite mesh. J Am Coll Surg 206:83-88.

- Baxter G M (2004). Hernias In Farm animal surgery. Fubini S I and Ducharme N G Missouri

Saunders Pp: 477-484.

-Weyhe D Schimtz I and Belyaev O (2006). Experimental comparison of monofilament light

and heavy polypropylene meshes for hernia repair. World J Surg 30 (8) :1586-1591.

- Eryilamz R Sahin M and Tekeliogu M H (2006). Which repair in umbilical hernia of adult

primary or mesh. Int Surg 91: 258-261.

- Schug-Pass C Tamme C Tannapted A and Rockerting F (2006). A light weight polypropylene

meshes for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernia in porcine. Surg Endosc

(3) :402-409.

-AL-Sobayil F A and Ahmed A F (2007). Surgical treatment for different forms of hernia in

sheep and goats. J Vet Sci 8: 185-191.

- Dubois P M and Freeman J B (1980). Traumatic abdominal wall hernia. J Trauma 21: 72-74.

- Avtan L Avei C and Bulin T (1997). Mesh infections after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 192-195.

- Verbeeck N Larrousse C and Lamy S (2005).Diagnosis of inguinal hernias The current role of

sonography. J Br Res 88: 233-236.

- Jose M Vilar J A and Corbera G S (2011). Double-layer mesh hernioplasty for repairing

umbilical hernias in (10) goats. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 35 (1): 1-5